Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 1: The Four Different Trap Modifications: Sinker (A), Mesh (B), Assist (C), String (D).
doi 10.7717/peerj.6308/fig-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 1: Analysis of DEmRNAs (A, C) and DEcircRNAs (B, D).
Figure 2: Activity Densities (Mean ± 95% CI) of Carabid Beetles (A), Staphylinid Beetles (B) and Spiders (C) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.
Figure 1: Images Showing the Four Surfaces: (A) Indoor, Flat, (B) Outdoor, Paved (C) Outdoor, Cobbled and (D) Indoor, Uneven.
Figure 1: Nana Positioning Protocol (A, C) and NHANES Positioning Protocol (B, D).
Figure 3: Carabid Beetle Species Richness (A) and Community Weighted Mean Body Size Within the Carabid Assemblages (B) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.
Figure 1: Soil Microbial Biomass Under Nitrogen Addition in the NRL (A–B), NL (C–D) and C (E–F) Treatments.
Figure 4: Relative Abundance of the Dominant Phyla (A) Firmicutes, (B) Ptoteobacteria, (C) Actinobacteria, (D) Fusobacteria) in Different Wintering Periods.
Figure 1: Histological Section of A. Dabryanus Testis (A–C) and Ovaries (D–F) at Different Developmental Stages.
Figure 1: Transition States (A and B) and Products (C and D) Arising From Perpendicular (A and C) or Parallel (B and D) Attack of Benzene by Compound I in the Doublet (S= 1∕2) State.
