Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 3: Mixed Effects Model Fitted to the Responses of Duration Discrimination With Frequency Range Difference Calculated as the Difference Between the Absolute Values of the Dynamic Fo Ranges.
doi 10.7717/peerj.3734/table-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 1: Difference of the AIC Values Between Various Models Predicting Observed Interaction Frequencies and the Model With Lowest AIC Value.
Frequency-Comb-Based Absolute Frequency Measurements in the Mid-Infrared With a Difference-Frequency Spectrometer
Optics Letters
Optics
Atomic
Molecular Physics,
Table 3: Comparison of the Optimal Flux Values for the TCA Cycle Model as Calculated by FluxPyt and OpenFLUX.
The Relationship of Stratospheric QBO With the Difference of Measured and Calculated NmF2
Acta Geophysica
Geophysics
Effects of the Difference Between Self and Coactor Scores Upon the Audit Responses That Allow Access to These Scores1
Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
Behavioral Neuroscience
Experimental
Cognitive Psychology
Range Compensation for Backscattering Measurements in the Difference-Frequency Nearfield of a Parametric Sonar
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
Acoustics
Ultrasonics
Arts
Humanities
Art as an Instrument to Grasp the Difference Between the Ill and the Illness
Archivos Argentinos de Pediatria
Child Health
Pediatrics
Perinatology
Discrimination With a Difference: Can Employment Discrimination Law Accommodate the Americans With Disabilities Act?
SSRN Electronic Journal
Frequency Difference Mapping Applied to the Corpus Callosum at 7T
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Imaging