Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Table 2: Recognition Memory Performance.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8169/table-2
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Table 2: Performance Metrics.

English

Practice Makes Imperfect: Working Memory Training Can Harm Recognition Memory Performance

Memory and Cognition
ArtsNeuropsychologyCognitive PsychologyHumanitiesPhysiological PsychologyMedicineExperimental
2016English

Primate Auditory Recognition Memory Performance Varies With Sound Type

Hearing Research
Sensory Systems
2009English

Auditory Recognition Memory Is Inferior to Visual Recognition Memory

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2009English

Table 2: Estimation of SWAT Model Performance.

English

Table 2: Performance Comparison Between FASTKs and GenoDup.

English

Table 2: Performance Comparison of OD Segmentation Methods.

English

Table 2: D-Genies Processing Time and Memory Consumption for Ensembl Datasets.

English

Fornix Microstructure and Memory Performance Is Associated With Altered Neural Connectivity During Episodic Recognition

Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
PsychiatryClinical PsychologyMental HealthNeurologyNeuroscience
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy