Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

REACH Testing Requirements Must Not Be Driven by Reproductive Toxicity Testing in Animals

ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals - United Kingdom
doi 10.1177/026119290603400405
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryMedical Laboratory TechnologyMedicineToxicology
Date

August 1, 2006

Authors
Horst SpielmannRichard Vogel
Publisher

SAGE Publications


Related search

McP: A Security Testing Tool Driven by Requirements

2019English

Experiments Testing Macroscopic Quantum Superpositions Must Be Slow

Scientific Reports
Multidisciplinary
2016English

Effectiveness of Genetic Testing in Certain Diseases Must Be Evaluated

BMJ
1998English

The Way Forward for Reproductive/Developmental Toxicity Testing

ATLA Alternatives to Laboratory Animals
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryMedical Laboratory TechnologyMedicineToxicology
2008English

Toxicity Testing

Nature
Multidisciplinary
1981English

Probabilistic May/Must Testing: Retaining Probabilities by Restricted Schedulers

Formal Aspects of Computing
Theoretical Computer ScienceSoftware
2012English

Direct to Consumer Testing in Reproductive Contexts – Should Health Professionals Be Concerned?

Life Sciences, Society and Policy
ManagementMonitoringMolecular BiologyBiochemistryPhilosophyPolicyGeneticsLaw
2015English

Costs of Toxicity Testing

Nature
Multidisciplinary
1979English

Clinical Pathology Testing in Toxicity Studies

Toxicologic Pathology
Forensic MedicineToxicologyPathologyCell BiologyMolecular Biology
1992English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy