Comparison of 4% Succinylated Gelatin With 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 for Preloading Prior to Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Patients

International Journal of Biomedical and Advance Research
doi 10.7439/ijbar.v7i9.3637
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Scholar Science Journals

Related search

The Effect of 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 on Hemostasis and Hemodynamic Efficacy in Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Comparison With 6% Hydroxyethyl Starch 200/0.5

Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
2007English

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Without Aortic Manipulation

2014English

A Comparation of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With and Without Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Euroscore High Risk Patients

Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences
Medicine
2007English

Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Hemodialysis-Dependent Patients

Circulation Journal
MedicineCardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2012English

Economics of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

BMJ
1985English

Implications of Hemodialysis in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

International Journal of Cardiovascular Research
2013English

Comparison of Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting With Open Coronary Endarterectomy Followed by Coronary Artery Revascularization

Turkiye Klinikleri Cardiovascular Sciences
Cardiovascular MedicineCardiology
2017English

Clinical Impact of Disinvestment in Hydroxyethyl Starch for Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study

Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
MedicineAnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Safety of Hydroxyethyl Starch 130/0.4 in Paediatric Cardiac Patients - A Reply

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy