Figure S1: Pairwise Comparisons of Density, Depth, and Thickness of Each Krill Aggregation (N = 2,911)

doi 10.7717/peerj.8906/supp-3

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

An Aggregation Function Based on Pairwise Comparisons

International Journal of Scientific and Innovative Mathematical Research

2017

English

Figure S1: Rarefaction Curves Illustrating Sampling Depth in Each Endometrial Sample

English

Table S1: Results of Pairwise Comparisons for All Studied Groups of Samples in Alpha-Diversity Measures (Mann–Whitney Pairwise Test)

English

Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Summary of the Sequencing Depth for Each Sample.

English

Figure 3: Density Contours Comparing the Depth and Density (Sv) of Krill Aggregations at Blue Whale Foraging Sightings (Red Shading) and in Absence of Blue Whales (Grey Shading).

English

Table S1: Mean and Standard Deviation of Measured Features for All Krill Aggregations (N = 2, 911)

English

Figure S1: Anterior Chanber and Lens Thickness From FDMI and FDMR

English

Graded Multilabel Classification by Pairwise Comparisons

2014

English

Figure S1: Effect of Embryo Aggregation on Developmental Competence of Porcine IVF Embryos

English

Amanote Research

Figure S1: Pairwise Comparisons of Density, Depth, and Thickness of Each Krill Aggregation (N = 2,911)

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

An Aggregation Function Based on Pairwise Comparisons

Figure S1: Rarefaction Curves Illustrating Sampling Depth in Each Endometrial Sample

Table S1: Results of Pairwise Comparisons for All Studied Groups of Samples in Alpha-Diversity Measures (Mann–Whitney Pairwise Test)

Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Summary of the Sequencing Depth for Each Sample.

Figure 3: Density Contours Comparing the Depth and Density (Sv) of Krill Aggregations at Blue Whale Foraging Sightings (Red Shading) and in Absence of Blue Whales (Grey Shading).

Table S1: Mean and Standard Deviation of Measured Features for All Krill Aggregations (N = 2, 911)

Figure S1: Anterior Chanber and Lens Thickness From FDMI and FDMR

Graded Multilabel Classification by Pairwise Comparisons

Figure S1: Effect of Embryo Aggregation on Developmental Competence of Porcine IVF Embryos