Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Vacuum Extraction or Forceps?
BMJ
doi 10.1136/bmj.292.6515.272-d
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
January 25, 1986
Authors
H Simpson
Publisher
BMJ
Related search
Comparision of Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Outlet Forceps and Vacuum Extraction Deliveries
Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research
578: Right Instrument, Right Patient, Right Time: Vacuum and Forceps vs. Forceps Alone
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Gynecology
Obstetrics
Comparison of Sequential Use of Forceps or Spatula Versus Cesarean Section After Failed Vacuum Delivery: Neonatal and Maternal Outcome
European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Gynecology
Reproductive Medicine
Obstetrics
Forceps Extraction of Slippery Lenses in Cases of Cataract
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Molecular Neuroscience
Ophthalmology
Sensory Systems
Cellular
Comparison Between Forceps, Single Blade Forceps and Manual Extraction of Fetal Head in Elective Caesarean Section: A Randomized Control Trial—Forceps Delivery in Cesarean Section
Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
P04.06: Fetal Rotation During Vacuum Extraction
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Nuclear Medicine
Radiology
Ultrasound Technology
Gynecology
Reproductive Medicine
Radiological
Imaging
Obstetrics
Medicine
Not Which Forceps, but Whether Forceps?
Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia
Medicine
Anesthesiology
Pain Medicine
The Intra-Capsular Extraction of Cataract With Forceps: Is Its Use Justifiable?
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Molecular Neuroscience
Ophthalmology
Sensory Systems
Cellular
576: Maternal Morbidity After Forceps vs Vacuum Assisted Delivery - Outcomes From a Large State-Wide Cohort
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Gynecology
Obstetrics