(PDF) Table S2: Number of Reads and OTUs Per Butterfly

Table S2: Number of Reads and OTUs Per Butterfly Species

doi 10.7717/peerj.5502/supp-2

Full Text

Open PDF

Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ

Related search

Table 1: Percentage of Raw Reads of the 11 Most Common OTUs, Averaged Per (Sub)species.

English

Table 1: Number of Reads, Number of Fungal Reads, Observed Fungal OTUs, Expected Fungal OTUs (Chao1) and Coverage (Good’s Coverage) in Seawater and Sponge Samples at a 97% Sequence Similarity Threshold.

English

Table S2: Results Per County

English

Table 1: Number of Shifts Per Clinician Participant and Number of Participants Per Shift.

English

Table S2: Identified Organisms in the OTUs Generated by 454 Pyrosequencing

English

Table S2: Summary of Clean Reads Mapped to the Cucumber Genome

English

Table S2: The 93 Virtually Restricted Bacterial OTUs Matched With T-RFs

English

Table S2: Detailed Information About the Dominant 50 OTUs in Heat Map

English

Table 4: Number of Journals Per Open Access.

English

Amanote Research

Table S2: Number of Reads and OTUs Per Butterfly Species

doi 10.7717/peerj.5502/supp-2

Full Text

Abstract

Date

Authors

Publisher

Related search

Table 1: Percentage of Raw Reads of the 11 Most Common OTUs, Averaged Per (Sub)species.

Table 1: Number of Reads, Number of Fungal Reads, Observed Fungal OTUs, Expected Fungal OTUs (Chao1) and Coverage (Good’s Coverage) in Seawater and Sponge Samples at a 97% Sequence Similarity Threshold.

Table S2: Results Per County

Table 1: Number of Shifts Per Clinician Participant and Number of Participants Per Shift.

Table S2: Identified Organisms in the OTUs Generated by 454 Pyrosequencing

Table S2: Summary of Clean Reads Mapped to the Cucumber Genome

Table S2: The 93 Virtually Restricted Bacterial OTUs Matched With T-RFs

Table S2: Detailed Information About the Dominant 50 OTUs in Heat Map

Table 4: Number of Journals Per Open Access.