Classification and Prevalence of Spin in Abstracts of Non-Randomized Studies Evaluating an Intervention

BMC Medical Research Methodology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s12874-015-0079-x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Evaluating Non-Randomised Intervention Studies

Health Technology Assessment
MedicineHealth Policy
2003English

Reporting Quality of Randomized and Non-Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts From Chicken Research

2016English

Developing, Implementing and Evaluating an End of Life Care Intervention

Nursing older people
Gerontology
2017English

Interpretation of Results of Studies Evaluating an Intervention Highlighted in Google Health News: A Cross-Sectional Study of News

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2015English

Correction To: Three Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating the Impact of “Spin” in Health News Stories Reporting Studies of Pharmacologic Treatments on Patients’/Caregivers’ Interpretation of Treatment Benefit

BMC Medicine
Medicine
2019English

Monitoring and Evaluating Cataract Intervention in India

British Journal of Ophthalmology
Molecular NeuroscienceOphthalmologySensory SystemsCellular
1997English

Presence of ‘Spin’ in the Abstracts and Titles of Anaesthesiology Randomised Controlled Trials

British Journal of Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2019English

Evaluating an Educational Intervention of Central Venous Catheter Maintenance Among Oncology Nurses

American Journal of Infection Control
EpidemiologyPublic HealthHealth PolicyInfectious DiseasesEnvironmentalOccupational Health
2015English

Reporting Quality of Randomized Controlled Trial Abstracts Published in Leading Laser Medicine Journals: An Assessment Using the CONSORT for Abstracts Guidelines

Lasers in Medical Science
DermatologySurgery
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy