Evaluation of Maternal and Neonatal Results After Immediate Labor Induction by Vaginal Misoprostol and Expectational Treatment

African Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology
doi 10.5897/ajpp11.783
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Academic Journals

Related search

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes of Induction of Labor With Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Intravenous Oxytocin

Journal of High Institute of Public Health
2010English

Effectiveness, Safety and Costs of Labor Induction With Intravaginal Misoprostol Versus Dinoprostone Vaginal Insert

Clinical Investigation
2017English

Maternal and Neonatal Outcome of Labour Induction at Term Comparing Two Regimens of Misoprostol

Journal of Perinatal Medicine
GynecologyChild HealthPediatricsPerinatologyObstetrics
2014English

Comparative Study of Titrated Oral Misoprostol Solution and Vaginal Dinoprostone for Labor Induction at Term Pregnancy

Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics
MedicineGynecologyObstetrics
2016English

Oral Misoprostol for Induction of Labor

Nepal Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
1970English

171: Assessing Maternal and Neonatal Risks Associated With Prolonged Induction of Labor

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2018English

A Critical Appraisal of the Misoprostol Removable, Controlled-Release Vaginal Delivery System of Labor Induction

International Journal of Women's Health
GynecologyOncologyMidwiferyMaternityObstetrics
2015English

Low‐dose Vaginal Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone Insert for Induction of Labor Beyond 41st Week: A Randomized Trial

Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica
MedicineGynecologyObstetrics
2019English

Misoprostol for Induction of Labor: A Review

Journal of Medical Science And clinical Research
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy