Interceptive Subtraction, Unjust Enrichment and Wrongs—a Reply to Professor Birks

Cambridge Law Journal - United Kingdom
doi 10.1017/s0008197303006457
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date
Authors
Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Related search

Reparations and Unjust Enrichment

SSRN Electronic Journal
2004English

Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart

Harvard Law Review
Law
1958English

A Reply to Professor Morris' Statement of Dissent

University of Pennsylvania Law Review
Law
1966English

On ATCO Gas and Pipelines: A Reply to Professor Woolley

Alberta Law Review
2015English

On Earl Warren's Retirement: A Reply to Professor Kurland

Michigan Law Review
Law
1969English

Professor Taylor's Reply

Philosophy
Philosophy
1929English

Strict Liability for Gatekeepers: A Reply to Professor Coffee

SSRN Electronic Journal
2003English

Criminal Responsibility of the Insane: A Reply to Professor Ballantine

Journal of the American Institute of Criminal Law and Criminology
1921English

On the Fusion of Fact and Value: A Reply to Professor Fuller

American Journal of Jurisprudence
Law
1958English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy