Learning From Transnational Differences in How Risk of Harm Is Viewed in Human Research Ethics

European Journal of Public Health - United Kingdom
doi 10.1093/eurpub/cky212.747
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Related search

What Is the Role of the Research Ethics Committee? Paternalism, Inducements, and Harm in Research Ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics
ArtsHumanitiesLegal AspectsHealth PolicyHealthEthicsIssues
2005English

Consensus Standards for Introductory E-Learning Courses in Human Participants Research Ethics

Journal of Medical Ethics
ArtsHumanitiesLegal AspectsHealth PolicyHealthEthicsIssues
2013English

Collaborative Case-Based Learning Process in Research Ethics

International Journal for Educational Integrity
EducationSocial Sciences
2019English

Research Ethics: Assuring Anonymity at the Individual Level May Not Be Sufficient to Protect Research Participants From Harm

Biological Conservation
EvolutionEcologyNatureSystematicsBehaviorLandscape Conservation
2016English

How to Approach a Research Ethics Committee

Advances in Psychiatric Treatment
2007English

How Useful Is Plastination in Learning Anatomy?

Journal of Veterinary Medical Education
MedicineVeterinaryEducation
2007English

Individual Contributions to Collective Harm: How Important Is Causation?

Ethics and Global Politics
SociologyInternational RelationsPolitical Science
2019English

Transnational Aging: Toward a Transnational Perspective in Old Age Research

European Journal of Ageing
GerontologyGeriatricsHealth
2017English

Sex Differences in Risk-Taking and Associative Learning in Rats

Royal Society Open Science
Multidisciplinary
2015English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy