Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: Five Year Follow Up
BMJ
doi 10.1136/bmj.326.7397.1012
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
May 10, 2003
Authors
M Douek
Publisher
BMJ
Related search
Laparoscopic Versus Open Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia
BMJ
Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Inguinal Hernia
World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgery
Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair Versus Open Mesh Plug Repair for Bilateral Primary Inguinal Hernia
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery
Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Partially Absorbable Lightweight Mesh and Multifilament Polyester Anatomical Mesh in Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair
Asian journal of endoscopic surgery
Medicine
A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair and Open Lichtenstein Mesh Repair
The Medical Journal of Cairo University
Prospective Trial Comparing Open Approach of Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh With Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approach for Repair of Inguinal Hernia: Tertiary Center Experience
International Surgery Journal
Pcn182 - Cost-Effectiveness Randomized Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair
Value in Health
Medicine
Health Policy
Public Health
Occupational Health
Environmental
Five Year Follow Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial of a Stroke Rehabilitation Unit
BMJ
Light vs Heavy Weight Mesh in Lichtenstein’s Open Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Prospective Study
International Journal of Surgery Science
