Blood Lead Levels, Scientific Misconduct and the Needleman Case. 2. The Critics' Arguments.

American Journal of Public Health - United States
doi 10.2105/ajph.86.1.112-a
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Public Health Association

Related search

Blood Lead Levels, Scientific Misconduct, and the Needleman Case. 1. A Reply From the Lead Industry.

American Journal of Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
1996English

Scientific Misconduct: Our First (Known) Case

Einstein (São Paulo, Brazil)
Medicine
2014English

Editorial: A Case of Scientific Misconduct

Annales Geophysicae
Planetary SciencesGeologySpaceAtmospheric SciencePlanetary ScienceAstrophysicsEarthAstronomy
2000English

Plagiarism and Scientific Misconduct

The American Journal of Cosmetic Surgery
2014English

Scientific Misconduct and Publication Ethics

Journal of Nihon University Medical Association
2019English

Home Refinishing, Lead Paint, and Infant Blood Lead Levels.

American Journal of Public Health
EnvironmentalPublic HealthOccupational Health
1985English

Policing Misconduct: More Data Needed on Scientific Misconduct

Nature
Multidisciplinary
2017English

Blood Lead Levels: Rhoads and Brown Respond

Environmental Health Perspectives
MutagenesisPublic HealthEnvironmentalHealthToxicologyOccupational Health
2008English

2. Taking the Critics to Task: The Case for Task-Based Teaching

2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy