Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Comparative Study on the Operation of Australian Jury System and Chinese Courts
doi 10.25236/ssah.2017.10
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
January 1, 2017
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
Francis Academic Press
Related search
Jurors' Perceptions, Understanding, Confidence and Satisfaction in the Jury System: A Study in Six Courts
Law Reform by Courts, Legislatures, and Commissions Following Empirical Research on Jury Instructions
Law and Society Review
Law
Sociology
Political Science
The French Jury System
Michigan Law Review
Law
How the Creation of Appellate Courts in England and the United States Limited Judicial Comment on Evidence to the Jury
SSRN Electronic Journal
Features of the System of Appealing Against Chinese People’s Courts Rulings on Refusal of Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards
Вестник Пермского университета. Юридические науки
Comparative Study on the Competency of Classifying Between Chinese and U.S. First Grade Students
Journal of Mathematics Education
Jurisdiction Under the Hague Choice of Courts Convention: Its Likely Impact on Australian Practice
Journal of Private International Law
Law
International Relations
Political Science
Comparative Study of Chinese and Japanese Language Promotion Policy
Digital Evidence in the Jury Room: The Impact of Mobile Technology on the Jury
Current Issues in Criminal Justice
