Comparative Retrospective Study of Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Surgery, Native Tissue Repair, and Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair

Obstetrics and Gynecology International - United States
doi 10.1155/2020/7367403
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Hindawi Limited

Related search

Transvaginal Mesh or Grafts Compared With Native Tissue Repair for Vaginal Prolapse

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2016English

Surgical Technique Used in the UK for Native Tissue Anterior Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair (VaST)

International Urogynecology Journal
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2019English

Mesh, Graft, or Standard Repair for Prolapse Surgery?

The Lancet
Medicine
2017English

Comparison of Postoperative Short-Term Outcomes Between Tension-Free Vaginal Mesh Surgery Using the Capio™ SLIM Suture Capturing Device and Conventional TVM Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Obstetrics and Gynecology International
GynecologyObstetrics
2018English

Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair Using the Uphold™ Vaginal Support System: A 1-Year Multicenter Study

International Urogynecology Journal
GynecologyUrologyObstetrics
2016English

Laparoscopic Pectopexy: A New Technique for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

JAPANESE JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC ENDOSCOPY
2019English

A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair and Open Lichtenstein Mesh Repair

The Medical Journal of Cairo University
2019English

Our Recurrence Ratios in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgical Repair

Kocaeli Medical Journal
2019English

Persistent Postoperative Granulation Tissue Following Vaginal Prolapse Repair

Proceedings in Obstetrics and Gynecology
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy