A Comparison of Mandibular Position by Four Different Guiding Methods; Gothic Arch Tracing, Habitual Closure, Voluntary Tapping and Myo-Monitor Centric.

Nihon Hotetsu Shika Gakkai Zasshi
doi 10.2186/jjps.29.256
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Japan Prosthodontic Society

Related search

Evaluation of Simultaneous Recording Method of Gothic Arch Tracing and Check Bite Taking

The Journal of the Kyushu Dental Society
2004English

Dimensional Accuracy of Different Impression Techniques of Partially Edentulous Mandibular Arch

RGO Revista Gaucha de Odontologia
Dentistry
2017English

Comparison of Four Different Reduction Methods for Anterior Dislocation of the Shoulder

Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
SurgeryOrthopedicsSports Medicine
2015English

Effect of Different Dental Impression Disinfectants on the Mandibular Teeth and Dental Arch Measurements

IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences
2016English

Management of Anterior Mandibular Fractures Using Four Fixation Methods: A Clinical Comparative Study

Egyptian Dental Journal
2018English

A Comparison of Student Teachers' Beliefs From Four Different Science Teaching Domains Using a Mixed Methods Design

International Journal of Science Education
Education
2012English

Comparison of Four Different Internal Fixation Methods in the Treatment of Distal Clavicle Fractures

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine
MedicineCancer ResearchImmunologyMicrobiology
2019English

Geomorphometric Comparison of DEMs Built by Different Interpolation Methods

Landform Analysis
2017English

Differentiating Passive From Transporter-Mediated Uptake by PepT1: A Comparison and Evaluation of Four Methods

Journal of Surgical Research
Surgery
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy