Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Sophisticated Voting on Competing Ballot Measures: Spatial Theory and Evidence

SSRN Electronic Journal
doi 10.2139/ssrn.1185262
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

January 1, 2008

Authors
David Hugh-Jones
Publisher

Elsevier BV


Related search

Election Results of Southwest Ballot Measures Affecting Healthcare

Southwest Journal of Pulmonary and Critical Care
2016English

Voting Theory: Сui Bono?

The Journal of Political Theory, Political Philosophy and Sociology of Politics Politeia
2018English

A Spatial Mankiw-Romer-Weil Model: Theory and Evidence

SSRN Electronic Journal
2009English

Voting on Social Security : Evidence From OECD Countries

Working paper (Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland)
1995English

Probabilistic Voting in the Spatial Model of Elections: The Theory of Office-Motivated Candidates

English

Sophisticated Approval Voting, Ignorance Priors, and Plurality Heuristics: A Behavioral Social Choice Analysis in a Thurstonian Framework.

Psychological Review
Philosophy of SciencePsychologyHistory
2007English

Voting and Peer Effects: Experimental Evidence From Mozambique

Economic Development and Cultural Change
DevelopmentEconomicsEconometrics
2020English

State and Local Limitations on Ballot Measure Contributions

Michigan Law Review
Law
1981English

Cue-Taking, Satisficing, or Both? Quasi-Experimental Evidence for Ballot Position Effects

Political Behavior
SociologyPolitical Science
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy