Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 6: Pairwise FST Divergences Between the Analysed Brown Trout Populations Based on Microsatellite (Below Diagonal) and Nuclear PCR-RFLP Data (Above Diagonal) and Their Significance Level.
doi 10.7717/peerj.5152/table-6
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 4: Pairwise FST Values Between Studied Populations of the Noble Crayfish (Below Diagonal), and Significance Values of Allelic Differentiation for Each Population Pair (Above Diagonal) After Sequential Bonferroni Adjustments.
Table 4: Pairwise FST Values (Below Diagonal) and Geographic Distance (Km) (Above Diagonal) Among Garra Cambodgiensis Population Samples in the Upper Nan River, Thailand.
Supplemental Information 1: Table S1. Pairwise Nm Values (Below the Diagonal) and Geographic Distances (Above the Diagonal) Among the 21 Sampled Populations of B. Schreberi.
Table 1: Phenotypic Correlations (Spearman’s Rank) Among Morphological Traits in Orchis Mascula (Above Diagonal) and O. Pauciflora (Below Diagonal).
Table 5: Summary of the Population Genetic Analyses of Two Nuclear PCR-RFLP and Five Microsatellite (MS) Loci for Cultured and Wild Brown Trout Populations in Hungary.
Table 1: Number of Unique (Diagonal in Bold) and Shared (Below the Diagonal) Lepidopteran Species Between Restoration Treatments.
Table 4: Pairwise FST Comparisons of Geographic Regions Based on SNP (A) and Microsatellite (B) Data.
Table 3: Proportion of the Female Individuals (Nf) and the Danubian Lineages in Cultured and Wild Brown Trout Populations in Hungary Based on sdY and PCR-RFLP Markers.
Table S2: Pairwise FST Values
