Evaluating the Role of Quality Assessment of Primary Studies in Systematic Reviews of Cancer Practice Guidelines

BMC Medical Research Methodology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/1471-2288-5-8
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2013English

Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
MedicineHealth PolicyPharmacology
2006English

No Role for Quality Scores in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

BMC Medical Research Methodology
EpidemiologyHealth Informatics
2005English

A Suggestion for Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology

Epidemiology and health
Medicine
2016English

Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

BMC Nephrology
Nephrology
2019English

Cancer-Related Fatigue: Role of Oncology Nurses in Translating National Comprehensive Cancer Network Assessment Guidelines Into Practice

Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing
Oncology
2008English

The Increasing Need for Systematic Reviews of Prognosis Studies: Strategies to Facilitate Review Production and Improve Quality of Primary Research

Diagnostic and Prognostic Research
2019English

Improving the Quality of Systematic Reviews in Spinal Cord

Spinal Cord
MedicineNeurologyRehabilitation
2013English

Analysis of Quality of Interventions in Systematic Reviews

BMJ
2005English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy