Evaluating the Role of Quality Assessment of Primary Studies in Systematic Reviews of Cancer Practice Guidelines

BMC Medical Research Methodology- United Kingdom

doi 10.1186/1471-2288-5-8

Full Text

Abstract

Available in

Categories

Health Informatics

Date

February 16, 2005

Authors

Melissa C Brouwers

Mary E Johnston

Manya L Charette

Alejandro R Jadad

George P Browman

Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Quality Assessment of Observational Studies for Systematic Reviews

Value in Health

Occupational Health

English

Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines

Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research

English

No Role for Quality Scores in Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Health Informatics

English

A Suggestion for Quality Assessment in Systematic Reviews of Observational Studies in Nutritional Epidemiology

Epidemiology and health

English

Quality Assessment of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review

English

Cancer-Related Fatigue: Role of Oncology Nurses in Translating National Comprehensive Cancer Network Assessment Guidelines Into Practice

Clinical Journal of Oncology Nursing

English

The Increasing Need for Systematic Reviews of Prognosis Studies: Strategies to Facilitate Review Production and Improve Quality of Primary Research

Diagnostic and Prognostic Research

English

Improving the Quality of Systematic Reviews in Spinal Cord

English

Analysis of Quality of Interventions in Systematic Reviews

English