Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Anticholinergics Versus Botox for Urgency Urinary Incontinence

Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery - United States
doi 10.1097/spv.0000000000000277
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Related search

Authors' Reply Re: Cost-Effectiveness of a Pro-Active Approach of Urinary Incontinence in Women

BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2016English

OnabotulinumtoxinA vs Sacral Neuromodulation for Urgency Incontinence—Reply

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
2017English

Botox: Information Versus Werbung

Schweizerische Ärztezeitung
2012English

TVT Versus TVT-O for Minimally Invasive Surgical Correction of Stress Urinary Incontinence

International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
MedicineUrology
2007English

Experimental Studies for Urinary Incontinence

Japanese Journal of Urology
Urology
1989English

The Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Indacaterol Versus Tiotropium in a Chinese Medical Cost Setting

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2014English

An Effective Meta-Analysis of Magnetic Stimulation Therapy for Urinary Incontinence

Scientific Reports
Multidisciplinary
2019English

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Continuous Versus Intermittent Celecoxib Use for HIP and Knee Osteoarthritis

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2017English

Vascular Risk Factors for Male and Female Urgency Urinary Incontinence at Age 68 Years From a British Birth Cohort Study

BJU International
Urology
2018English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy