Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

A Comparative Evaluation of Two Algorithms of Detection of Masses on Mammograms

Signal & Image Processing : An International Journal
doi 10.5121/sipij.2012.3102
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

February 29, 2012

Authors
Guillaume Kom
Publisher

Academy and Industry Research Collaboration Center (AIRCC)


Related search

Robust Detection of Masses in Digitized Mammograms

2003English

Detection of Masses in Mammograms Using Bayesian Method and Machine Learning

International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE)
ArchitectureHardwareEngineeringChemical EngineeringBiotechnologyEnvironmental EngineeringComputer Science
2018English

A Comparative Evaluation of Name-Matching Algorithms

2003English

Comparative Study of Outlier Detection Algorithms

International Journal of Computer Applications
2016English

A Comparative Evaluation of Active Appearance Model Algorithms

1998English

Automatic Nipple Detection on Mammograms

Lecture Notes in Computer Science
Computer ScienceTheoretical Computer Science
2003English

Efficiencies of Algorithms for Vibration-Based Delamination Detection: A Comparative Study

Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures
Mechanics of MaterialsApplied Mathematics
2013English

Detection of Spiculated Lesions in Mammograms

English

Comparative Study of Two Recent Edge-Detection Algorithms Designed to Process Sea-Surface Temperature Fields

IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
EarthPlanetary SciencesElectricalElectronic Engineering
1991English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy