Is the Forcing of Services on Suppliers an Abuse of a Dominant Position? Case Comment to the Judgment of the Supreme Court of 19 February 2009 – DROP (Ref. No. III SK 31/08)

SSRN Electronic Journal
doi 10.2139/ssrn.1874824
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Elsevier BV

Related search

Wide Scope of Administrative Discretion Justified by Features of Telecommunications Market: Case Comment to the Judgment of the Polish Supreme Court of 2 April 2009 – Telekomunikacja Polska Sa v. The President of the Electronic Communications Office (Ref. No. III SK 28/08)

SSRN Electronic Journal
2010English

Abuse of a Dominant Position as a Specific Case of Abuse of the Right

LEX RUSSICA (РУССКИЙ ЗАКОН)
2018English

Gloss to the Resolution of the Supreme Court of 30 September 2015 – File Ref . No. I KZP 8/2015

Acta Iuris Stetinensis
2016English

The Law and Economy of the Abuse of a Dominant Position

Ekonomika preduzeca
2018English

The Spanish Constitutional Court Confronts Catalonia's ‘Right to Decide’ (Comment on the Judgment 42/2014)

European Constitutional Law Review
Law
2014English

The Judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of 23 June 2015 (No. SK 32/14) – Case Note (Partially Approving)

Comparative Law Review
Law
2016English

Knowing the Supreme Court? A Reconsideration of Public Ignorance of the High Court

Journal of Politics
SociologyPolitical Science
2009English

The Supreme Court of the United States

Yale Law Journal
Law
1907English

Supreme Court of the United States

American Journal of International Law
LawInternational RelationsPolitical Science
1937English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy