Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 5: Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenetic Tree Based on trnL-trnF and trnT-trnL Regions of 33 Mulberry Accessions.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8158/fig-5
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Supplemental Information 3: Bayesian Inference Phylogenetic Tree Based on trnL-trnF and trnT-trnL Regions of 33 Mulberry Accessions.
Figure 4: Distribution of Different Sites Across trnL-trnF and trnT-trnL Regions.
Table 1: Mulberry Accessions Used in This Study and Sequence Characteristics of ITS, trnL-trnF, and trnT-trnL.
Figure 3: Maximum-Likelihood Phylogenetic Tree Based on ITS Sequences of 33 Mulberry Accessions.
Figure 2: Maximum Likelihood Phylogenetic Tree.
Supplemental Information 2: Bayesian Inference Phylogenetic Tree Based on ITS Sequences of 33 Mulberry Accessions.
Figure 5: Rooted Phylogenetic Tree ofWolbachiabased on 7 Markers by Maximum Likelihood.
Figure 5: Complete Plastid Genome Phylogenetic Tree of 49 Species Based on Maximum Likelihood Analysis and Bayesian Inference.
Evaluating the Systematic Position of Ehretia Asperula Zoll. & Moritzi Based on ITS1, matK and trnL-trnF DNA Sequences
Vietnam Journal of Science, Technology and Engineering
