Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Ten Myths Around Open Scholarly Publishing

doi 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27580
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

March 11, 2019

Authors
Jonathan P TennantHarry CraneTom CrickJacinto DavilaAsura EnkhbayarJohanna HavemannBianca KramerRyan MartinPaola MasuzzoAndy NobesCurt RiceBárbara R LópezTony Ross-HellauerSusanne SattlerPaul ThackerMarc Vanholsbeeck
Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Ten Myths Around Open Scholarly Publishing

2019English

Open Access Scholarly Journal Publishing in Chinese

Publications
Media TechnologyBusinessInformation SciencesCommunicationInternational ManagementLibraryComputer Science Applications
2017English

The Debate Around Open-Access Publishing

Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine
Medicine
2012English

How to Identify Peer-Reviewed Publications: Open-Identity Labels in Scholarly Book Publishing

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2019English

The Future of Scholarly Publishing

English

Scholarly Publishing & Open Access Within CUNY: One Faculty Looks at Changing the Paradigm

Urban Library Journal
2007English

The Scholarly Publishing Scene: Professional, Scholarly, and Other Magazines

Against the Grain
2015English

The New Decade of Scholarly Publishing

Marshall Journal of Medicine
2020English

Medical and Health Sciences Academics’ Behaviours and Attitudes Towards Open Access Publishing in Scholarly Journals

Information Development
LibraryInformation Sciences
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy