Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Antegrade Versus Open Inguinal Lymphadenectomy: A Retrospective Controlled Study

BMC Urology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s12894-019-0571-4
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Laparoscopic Versus Open Repair of Inguinal Hernia

World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgery
2008English

Laparoscopic Versus Open Mesh Repair of Inguinal Hernia

BMJ
1999English

Pcn182 - Cost-Effectiveness Randomized Study of Laparoscopic Versus Open Bilateral Inguinal Hernia Repair

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2018English

606 a Comparative Study of Pediatric Open Pyeloplasty, Laparoscopy-Assisted Extracorporeal Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty

European Urology, Supplements
Urology
2015English

Prospective Randomised Controlled Trial of Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Mesh Repair: Five Year Follow Up

BMJ
2003English

Retrospective Evaluation of Laparoscopic Versus Open Hartmann’s Reversal

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques
Surgery
2015English

78: Comparison of Total Vaginal Hysterectomy and Robot-Assisted Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Retrospective Study

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
GynecologyObstetrics
2016English

Robot Assisted Versus Laparoscopic Suturing Learning Curve in a Simulated Setting

Surgical Endoscopy
Surgery
2019English

Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Repair Versus Open Lichtenstein Repair: A Randomized Control Trial

International Surgery Journal
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy