Identification of the Bray-Curtis Similarity Index: Comment on Yoshioka (2008)

Marine Ecology - Progress Series - Germany
doi 10.3354/meps07841
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Inter-Research Science Center

Related search

Figure 5: Similarity of Trap Catches (Bray–-Curtis Similarity Coefficient) Against the Distance Between Each Trap Combinations.

English

Figure 4: Dendrogram for the Hierarchical Clustering of the 40 Rabbitfish Individuals (4 Species × 10 Individuals) Based on the Similarity of Food Items (Group-Average Linkage Method Using the Bray–Curtis Similarity Index).

English

Figure S3: Dendrogram Based on a Bray-Curtis Dissimilarity of Dinoflagellate Communities Along the Songhua River

English

Dr Bray and Co-Workers Comment

Archives of Disease in Childhood
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatology
1978English

Figure 9: Non-Metric Multidimensionalscaling (nmMDS) Representation of the Samples Using the Bray–Curtis Coefficient.

English

Dr Curtis and Professor Levin Comment

Archives of Disease in Childhood
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatology
1995English

Table 7: Top Eight Fish Species That Typified Each Stratum in the South Region in 2012 Based on SIMPER Analysis on the Bray–Curtis Similarity Calculated From Square-Root Transformed Abundance.

English

A Comment on the MPI Index

Journal of Economic Inequality
SociologyFinanceOrganizational BehaviorEconomicsPolitical ScienceEconometricsHuman Resource Management
2011English

Table 4: Summary of Similarity Percentage Analysis (SIMPER) Listing Species That Cumulatively Contribute 90% to the Dissimilarity (Bray Curtis) of the Two Underwater Visual Sampling Methods Based on Square-Root Transformed Density Data.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy