Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 1: Investigated Farmed and Wild Populations of Brown Trout in Hungary; Nine of These Were Newly Analysed for This Study and LF1 From Horváth Et Al. (2014).
doi 10.7717/peerj.5152/table-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 1: Location of the Sampling Area of Farmed and Wild Brown Trout Populations Within the Danubian Water Basin.
Table S3: Private Alleles of Analysed Microsatellite Loci in Two Hatcheries and Six Wild Populations in Hungary and in One Wild Serbian Population
Table 5: Summary of the Population Genetic Analyses of Two Nuclear PCR-RFLP and Five Microsatellite (MS) Loci for Cultured and Wild Brown Trout Populations in Hungary.
Table 3: Proportion of the Female Individuals (Nf) and the Danubian Lineages in Cultured and Wild Brown Trout Populations in Hungary Based on sdY and PCR-RFLP Markers.
Table 1: Detailed Information About GEO Data Were Showed in This Study.
Table 4: The Number of the Identified CR mtDNA Haplotypes in Cultured and Wild Brown Trout Stocks in Hungary Based on 753 Bp of Control Region.
Consequences of Farmed–wild Hybridization Across Divergent Wild Populations and Multiple Traits in Salmon
Ecological Applications
Ecology
Table 2: Applied Genetic Markers to Analyses of Brown Trout Populations in Hungarian Hatcheries and Wild Streams as Well as in One Serbian Population.
Table 1: Comparing Systems From Son Et Al. (2010), Lau Et Al. (2010), Fujiwara Et Al. (2011), Gjerlufsen Et Al. (2011), and This Work Based on Our User Requirements.
