The Contingent Wisdom of Dyads: When Discussion Enhances vs. Undermines the Accuracy of Collaborative Judgments

Management Science - United States
doi 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2823
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Related search

What Moderates the Accuracy of Ease of Learning Judgments?

Metacognition and Learning
Education
2017English

A Discussion of the Cognitive Load in Collaborative Problem-Solving

EURO Journal on Decision Processes
ManagementProbabilityBusinessDecision SciencesStatisticsComputational MathematicsAccountingApplied Mathematics
2014English

A Brief Discussion of the Efficacy of Raising Standardized Test Scores by Contingent Reinforcement.

Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Applied PsychologyPhilosophySociologyPolitical Science
1974English

Rescuing Collective Wisdom When the Average Group Opinion Is Wrong

Frontiers Robotics AI
Computer Science ApplicationsArtificial Intelligence
2017English

16. When Wisdom Assumes Bodily Form

2018English

The Accuracy of Subjective Judgments With Motor Learning: Comparison Between Young and Elderly People

Journal of the Japanese Physical Therapy Association
2014English

End of NHS Bursary Undermines the Dental Team

BDJ Team
2016English

When Does Contextual Positivity Influence Judgments of Familiarity? Investigating Moderators of the Positivity-Familiarity Effect

Social Cognition
DevelopmentalEducational PsychologySocial Psychology
2020English

When Does Culture Matter? Effects of Personal Knowledge on the Correction of Culture-Based Judgments

Journal of Marketing Research
MarketingEconomicsInternational ManagementBusinessEconometrics
2006English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy