Risk of Bias Judgments for Random Sequence Generation in Cochrane Systematic Reviews Were Frequently Not in Line With Cochrane Handbook

BMC Medical Research Methodology - United Kingdom
doi 10.1186/s12874-019-0804-y
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Considerations From the Risk of Bias Perspective for Updating Cochrane Reviews

Systematic Reviews
Medicine
2015English

Implementing Systematic Reviews of Prognosis Studies in Cochrane

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
2018English

Review of Cochrane Reviews on Acupuncture: How Chinese Resources Contribute to Cochrane Reviews

Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Alternative MedicineComplementary
2013English

What Do Cochrane Systematic Reviews Say About Telemedicine for Healthcare?

Sao Paulo Medical Journal
Medicine
2019English

The Evidence for Nursing Interventions in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Nurse researcher
TheoryResearch
2004English

Conservative Interventions for Urinary Incontinence in Women: An Overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews

Physiotherapy
Physical TherapySports TherapyRehabilitation
2017English

The Cochrane Library: More Systematic Reviews on Nutrition Needed

European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
MedicineNutritionDietetics
2005English

Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group

Spine
OrthopedicsNeurologySports MedicineSports Science
2003English

Rocuronium vs. Succinylcholine for Rapid Sequence Intubation: A Cochrane Systematic Review

Anaesthesia
AnesthesiologyPain Medicine
2017English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy