Reply to Collins and Copeland: Spontaneous Gelatinization Not Supported by Evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America - United States
doi 10.1073/pnas.1104199108
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Related search

One-Size-Fits-All Approach to PTSD in the VA Not Supported by the Evidence.

American Psychologist
MedicinePsychology
2014English

Are the Conclusions Supported by the Evidence?

British Journal of Psychiatry
MedicinePsychiatryMental Health
2013English

Sperm Quality and Tap Water: Disinfection By-Product Effects Not Supported

Environmental Health Perspectives
MutagenesisPublic HealthEnvironmentalHealthToxicologyOccupational Health
2007English

Reply to “Dyslexia: Still Not a Neurodevelopmental Disorder”

Brain Sciences
Neuroscience
2019English

Evidence for Fluoride Melts in Earth's Mantle Formed by Liquid Immiscibility: Comment and Reply: REPLY

Geology
Geology
2005English

Reply to Van Hoorn: Converging Lines of Evidence

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2012English

Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
PhilosophyPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2002English

Why I Am Not SHY: A Reply to Tononi and Cirelli

Neural Plasticity
Neurology
2013English

Reply to Smith and Shortle: Lacking Evidence of Hydraulic Efficiency Changes

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2013English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy