Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Too True to Be Bad: When Sets of Studies With Significant and Non-Significant Findings Are Probably True

doi 10.31234/osf.io/nnkg9
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

January 16, 2017

Authors
Daniel LakensAlexander Etz
Publisher

Center for Open Science


Related search

Time Too Good to Be True

Physics Today
AstronomyPhysics
2006English

Research Accomplishments That Are Too Good to Be True: Comment

Intensive Care Medicine
Critical CareIntensive Care Medicine
2014English

Seven Per Cent Solution: Too Good to Be True?

Nature
Multidisciplinary
1992English

Too Odd (Not) to Be True? A Reply to Olsson

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
PhilosophyPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
2002English

EP15.09: True Umbilical Cord Hemangioma With Significant Hemodynamic Alterations: Case Report

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Nuclear MedicineRadiologyUltrasound TechnologyGynecologyReproductive MedicineRadiologicalImagingObstetricsMedicine
2017English

Statins and Venous Thrombosis: A Story Too Good to Be True?

PLoS Medicine
BiochemistryBiotechnologyMolecular BiologyCell BiologyMedicine
2012English

Too Good to Be True? Ideomotor Theory From a Computational Perspective

Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology
2012English

Bisphosphonates and Lower Mortality Risk: When It Sounds to Be Good to Be True …

Osteoporosis International
MedicineEndocrinologyMetabolismDiabetes
2019English

Assessing the Graham’s Formula for Stock Selection: Too Good to Be True?

Open Journal of Social Sciences
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy