Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Using Lagged Outcomes to Evaluate Bias in Value-Added Models

doi 10.3386/w21961
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

February 1, 2016

Authors
Raj ChettyJohn FriedmanJonah Rockoff
Publisher

National Bureau of Economic Research


Related search

Using Lagged Outcomes to Evaluate Bias in Value-Added Models

American Economic Review
EconomicsEconometrics
2016English

Measurement Error and Bias in Value-Added Models

ETS Research Report Series
StatisticsProbabilityUncertaintyApplied PsychologySocial PsychologyEducation
2017English

Does Equating Matter in Value-Added Models?

Turkish Journal of Education
2018English

Offshoring Bias in U.S. Manufacturing: Implications for Productivity and Value Added

SSRN Electronic Journal
2010English

Methods for Accounting for Co-Teaching in Value-Added Models

Statistics and Public Policy
UncertaintyApplied MathematicsStatisticsProbabilityPublic Administration
2016English

Measuring the Impacts of Teachers I: Evaluating Bias in Teacher Value-Added Estimates

American Economic Review
EconomicsEconometrics
2014English

Test Measurement Error and Inference From Value-Added Models

B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy
EconomicsEconometricsFinance
2012English

Using Simulation Models to Evaluate Ape Nest Survey Techniques

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2010English

Value Added

National Accounts at a Glance
2011English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2026 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy