Virtual Confrontation: Is Videoconference Testimony by an Unavailable Witness Constitutional?

University of Chicago Law Review - United States
doi 10.2307/20141871
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
Law
Date
Authors
Publisher

JSTOR

Related search

Witness' Modesty Versus Criminal Defendant's Constitutional Rights: An Accommodation

Stanford Law Review
MedicineLaw
1966English

Waiver of Constitutional Right of Confrontation

Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1931-1951)
1948English

Unavailable

University of Pittsburgh Law Review
Law
2020English

Perjured Testimony: Its Effect on Criminal Defendants' Constitutional Rights

Duke Law Journal
Law
1958English

Verification of Witness Testimony During Interrogation in the Criminal Process of Ukraine

Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law
2019English

Courtroom Preparation of Hypnotic and Nonhypnotic Eyewitnesses; Jurors' Perceptions of Witness Testimony and the Impact of Expert Testimony.

English

Mental Health Expert Witness Testimony (EWT) in Family and Child Welfare Practice

Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention
2001English

Drawing an Inference From the Failure to Produce a Knowledgeable Witness: Evidentiary and Constitutional Considerations

California Law Review
Law
1973English

GRID: A Methodology Integrating Witness Testimony and Satellite Imagery Analysis for Documenting Alleged Mass Atrocities

Genocide Studies and Prevention
2014English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy