There Is No Convincing Evidence That Working Memory Training Is Effective: A Reply to Au Et Al. (2014) and Karbach and Verhaeghen (2014)

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review - United States
doi 10.3758/s13423-015-0862-z
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

Is the Link From Working Memory to Analogy Causal? No Analogy Improvements Following Working Memory Training Gains

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2014English

Is There Anything Special About Working Memory?

2009English

1229 Computerized Working Memory Training Is Effective in Preterm Born Children at Preschool Age

Archives of Disease in Childhood
Child HealthPediatricsPerinatology
2012English

A Critical Analysis of the 2014 CUA Guidelines for Erectile Dysfunction: Is There More That Can Be Done?

Canadian Urological Association Journal
Urology
2015English

Reply to Paraskevaidi Et Al.: Epithelial and Microenvironment Characterization Is Key to Understanding and Improving Diagnoses

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
Multidisciplinary
2019English

Reply to Abbas Et Al-A Response to “Infection Prevention: Is Copper the New Gold?”

Journal of Hospital Infection
MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiology
2019English

Reply to Hardalo Et Al., “Myelosuppression With Oxazolidinones: Are There Differences?”

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Infectious DiseasesPharmacology
2018English

Memory for Musical Tempo: Additional Evidence That Auditory Memory Is Absolute

Perception & Psychophysics
1996English

Is There Objective Evidence That Septal Surgery Improves Nasal Airflow?

Journal of Laryngology and Otology
MedicineOtorhinolaryngology
2006English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy