Comparison of the Multiple-Sample Means With Composite Sample Results for Fecal Indicator Bacteria by Quantitative PCR and Culture

Applied and Environmental Microbiology - United States
doi 10.1128/aem.01662-12
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Society for Microbiology

Related search

Discrimination of Viable and Dead Fecal Bacteroidales Bacteria by Quantitative PCR With Propidium Monoazide

Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied MicrobiologyBiotechnologyEcologyFood Science
2009English

False-Positive Results of Plasma PCR for Cytomegalovirus DNA Due to Delayed Sample Preparation

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
2000English

Culture Sample Collection and Transport

Science
MultidisciplinaryPhilosophy of ScienceHistory
1973English

Two-Sample and ANOVA Tests for High Dimensional Means

Annals of Statistics
UncertaintyStatisticsProbability
2019English

Utility of Universal Sample Processing Methodology, Combining Smear Microscopy, Culture, and PCR, for Diagnosis of Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
2005English

Quantitative Detection of Hepatitis a Virus and Enteroviruses Near the United States-Mexico Border and Correlation With Levels of Fecal Indicator Bacteria

Applied and Environmental Microbiology
Applied MicrobiologyBiotechnologyEcologyFood Science
2006English

A Comparison of K-Means and Fuzzy C-Means Clustering Methods for a Sample of Gulf Cooperation Council Stock Markets

Folia Oeconomica Stetinensia
2014English

Comparison of Various Sample Preparation Methods for PCR Diagnosis of Visceral Leishmaniasis Using Peripheral Blood

Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Microbiology
2001English

Using Check Sample Results

Cereal Foods World
Food Science
2008English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy