When Good Statistical Models of Aquifer Heterogeneity Go Bad: A Comparison of Flow, Dispersion, and Mass Transfer in Connected and Multivariate Gaussian Hydraulic Conductivity Fields

Water Resources Research - United States
doi 10.1029/2001wr001146
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Related search

Hydraulic Conductivity Fields: Gaussian or Not?

Water Resources Research
Water ScienceTechnology
2013English

Prediction of Velocity Statistics in Three-Dimensional Multi-Gaussian Hydraulic Conductivity Fields

Water Resources Research
Water ScienceTechnology
2006English

Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Textural Heterogeneity of Soils

2018English

Saturated Hydraulic Conductivity and Textural Heterogeneity of Soils

2018English

Assimilation of Historical Head Data to Estimate Spatial Distributions of Stream Bed and Aquifer Hydraulic Conductivity Fields

Hydrological Processes
Water ScienceTechnology
2017English

Field Study of Hydraulic Conductivity in a Heterogeneous Aquifer: Comparison of Single-Borehole Measurements Using Different Instruments

Water Resources Research
Water ScienceTechnology
2003English

When Cilia Go Bad: Cilia Defects and Ciliopathies

Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Cell BiologyMolecular Biology
2008English

When Papers Go Bad - Part I

Journal of Cell Science
Cell Biology
2004English

Hydraulic Conductivity Behaviors of Karst Aquifer With Conduit-Fissure Geomaterials

Frontiers in Earth Science
EarthPlanetary Sciences
2020English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy