Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 1: The Criteria for Evaluating Technology-Assisted White Cane.
doi 10.7717/peerj.6058/table-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 2: Evaluation and Comparison of Technology-Assisted White Cane Solutions.
Technology-Assisted White Cane: Evaluation and Future Directions
PeerJ
Genetics
Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Biological Sciences
Medicine
Agricultural
Neuroscience
Figure 2: The Identified Factors in Technology-Assisted White Cane.
New Criteria for Evaluating the Malt.
Kvasny Prumysl
Criteria for Evaluating Qualitative Research
Human Resource Development Quarterly
Arts
Organizational Behavior
Human Resource Management
Humanities
Evaluating the Best-Practice Criteria of Higher-Order Thinking Skills for Design and Technology Courses
International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering
Engineering
Management of Technology
Innovation
Evaluating Ship Selection Criteria for Maritime Transportation
Journal of Advanced Management Science
Table 1: Studies Evaluating Sexually Transmitted Infections Risk.
Two Criteria for Evaluating Risk Prediction Models
Biometrics
Statistics
Genetics
Probability
Molecular Biology
Biochemistry
Applied Mathematics
Microbiology
Immunology
Biological Sciences
Medicine
Agricultural
