A Reply to F. David Martin's Kandinsky and Ashmore: A Comment

Ultimate Reality and Meaning
doi 10.3138/uram.3.3.238
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

University of Toronto Press Inc. (UTPress)

Related search

Reply to a Comment by P.Yu. Apel’

Colloid Journal
SurfacesColloidInterfacesTheoretical ChemistrySurface ChemistryPhysical
2015English

Reply to a Comment by Joel Liebman

Journal of Chemical Physics
MedicineTheoretical ChemistryAstronomyPhysicsPhysical
1974English

Death and Reductionism: A Reply to John F Catherwood.

Journal of Medical Ethics
ArtsHumanitiesLegal AspectsHealth PolicyHealthEthicsIssues
1992English

Reply to the Comment

Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
MedicineHematology
2020English

Reply to Author Comment

2019English

Reply to the Comment

2020English

Reply to “Comment on ‘Past of a Quantum Particle’ ”

Physical Review A
2013English

A Reply to the Comment by Prof. H. Kano

The Journal of the Japanese Association of Mineralogists, Petrologists and Economic Geologists
1965English

Religious Education – Reform, Not Abolition: A Reply to Matthew Clayton and David Stephens

Theory and Research in Education
Education
2019English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy