Moochers and Makers in the Voting Booth: Who Benefits From Federal Spending and How Did They Vote in the 2012 Presidential Election?

Public Opinion Quarterly - United Kingdom
doi 10.1093/poq/nfu016
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Related search

Book Review: The 21st-Century Voter: Who Votes, How They Vote, and Why They Vote

Reference and User Services Quarterly
Information SystemsLibraryInformation Sciences
2017English

Probabilistic Polling and Voting in the 2008 Presidential Election

Public Opinion Quarterly
SociologyCommunicationPolitical ScienceHistorySocial SciencesPhilosophy of Science
2010English

The Hispanic Vote in the 2004 Presidential Election: Insecurity and Moral Concerns

Journal of Politics
SociologyPolitical Science
2008English

Who's Favored by Evaluative Voting? An Experiment Conducted During the 2012 French Presidential Election

Electoral Studies
International RelationsPolitical Science
2014English

Verification Voting Machine and the Management of the 2015 Presidential Election in Nigeria

The International Journal of Humanities & Social Studies
2019English

The Influence of Federal Spending on Presidential Elections

American Political Science Review
SociologyInternational RelationsPolitical Science
2012English

Local Economic Voting and Residence-Based Regionalism in South Korea: Evidence From the 2007 Presidential Election

Journal of East Asian Studies
DevelopmentSociologyInternational RelationsEconomicsPolitical ScienceEconometrics
2016English

Preliminary Analysis of the Voting Figures in Iran’s 2009 Presidential Election

2019English

Twitter Predicting the 2012 US Presidential Election?

Journal of Organizational and End User Computing
Computer Science ApplicationsManagementHuman-Computer InteractionStrategy
2016English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy