Eyetrack® (ET) vs the Conventional Paper Record (CPR): A Study Comparing the Accuracy and Speed of Data Retrieval From Glaucoma Patient Records

Eye - United Kingdom
doi 10.1038/sj.eye.6701813
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

Springer Science and Business Media LLC

Related search

The History of the Patient Record and the Paper Record

2018English

Comparing the Accuracy of High Tibial Osteotomies Between Computer Navigation and Conventional Methods

Computer Assisted Surgery
SurgeryComputer Science ApplicationsFamily Practice
2017English

Accuracy, Clinical and Patient-Centered Outcomes of Esthetic Implants- A 4 Years RCT Comparing Conventional With Guided Surgery Approach

Clinical Oral Implants Research
Oral Surgery
2018English

Facebook vs. Paper-And-Pencil Writing: Comparing Japanese EFL Students’ Opinions of the Writing Mediums

The Language Teacher 41.6
2017English

Accuracy and Generalizability of Using Automated Methods for Identifying Adverse Events From Electronic Health Record Data: A Validation Study Protocol

BMC Health Services Research
Health Policy
2017English

Qualitative Equivalence Between a Paper and Electronic Tablet Version of the Womac®Nrs3.1 and Patient Global Assessment

Value in Health
MedicineHealth PolicyPublic HealthOccupational HealthEnvironmental
2014English

Comparing Distance Education and Conventional Education: Observations From a Comparative Study of Post-Registration Nurses

Research in Learning Technology
Computer Science ApplicationsEducation
2002English

Comparing the Coding of Complications in Queensland and Victorian Admitted Patient Data

Australian Health Review
Health Policy
2011English

Better Accuracy From Sidescan Records: The Object-Chord Method

Bulletin of the Geological Society of Malaysia
EarthPlanetary Sciences
1988English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy