Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 8: Strict Consensus Tree Constructed With the Four Trees Presented in Figs. 4–7 (D, DC, DM & DCM).
doi 10.7717/peerj.5901/fig-8
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Time-Calibrated Strict Consensus Tree Resulting From the Present Analyses.
Figure 4: Strict Consensus of the Three Trees Resulting From the Analysis Treatment Incorporating Discrete Characters Only (D).
Supplemental Information 3: Fig. S2. Maximum Agreement Subtree Showing Consistent Relationships Between D, DC, DM & DCM Trees.
Figure S2: The Strict Consensus Tree of Analysis 1
Figure S8: The Strict Consensus Tree of Analysis 3
Figure S5: The Strict Consensus Tree of Analysis 2
Figure 6: Strict Consensus of Three Most Parsimonious Trees.
Table 3: Summary of the Character Composition for All Four Datasets (D, DC, DM and DCM) Analysed in This Study.
Figure 5: Strict Consensus of the Three Trees Produced by the Treatment Incorporating Discrete and Continuous Character Scoring (DC).
