What Counts as Fraud? An Empirical Study of Motions to Dismiss Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

Journal of Empirical Legal Studies - United Kingdom
doi 10.1111/j.1740-1461.2005.00033.x
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Categories
LawEducation
Date
Authors
Publisher

Wiley

Related search

Did the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act Work?

SSRN Electronic Journal
2002English

Do the Merits Matter Less After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act?

Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization
LawEconomicsEconometricsHuman Resource ManagementOrganizational Behavior
2006English

Auditor Litigation and the Penalties on U.S. Client Firms After the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act

JABM JOURNAL of ACCOUNTING - BUSINESS & MANAGEMENT
2018English

Implications of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 for Judicial Presumptions of Market Efficiency

University of Chicago Law Review
Law
1998English

Reforming Securities Litigation Reform: Restructuring the Relationship Between Public and Private Enforcement of Rule 10b-5

SSRN Electronic Journal
2008English

Securities Exchange Act: Defrauded Issuer Has Private Right of Action Under Section 10(b)

Duke Law Journal
Law
1961English

The Effect of Investor Attention on Fraud Discovery and Value Loss in Securities Class Action Litigation

SSRN Electronic Journal
2017English

Anchoring Effect in Real Litigation: An Empirical Study

SSRN Electronic Journal
2016English

Some Problems of Exemption Under the Securities Act of 1933

Law and Contemporary Problems
Law
1937English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy