Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Figure 3: Comparison of the MultSE With (A) the Standard Error of Mean Cover by Site, and (B) Coral Species Richness.

doi 10.7717/peerj.8429/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

Unknown

Authors

Unknown

Publisher

PeerJ


Related search

Figure 2: Achieved MultSE for Each Site. Error Bars Represent 2.5 and 97.5 Percentiles.

English

Figure 3: Carabid Beetle Species Richness (A) and Community Weighted Mean Body Size Within the Carabid Assemblages (B) for the Four Different Pitfall Trap Types.

English

The Study of Species Richness in Coral Communities of Vietnam

Environment and Ecology Research
2017English

Temporal Comparison and Predictors of Fish Species Abundance and Richness on Undisturbed Coral Reef Patches

PeerJ
GeneticsMolecular BiologyBiochemistryBiological SciencesMedicineAgriculturalNeuroscience
2015English

Figure 3: Mean Benthic Cover Per Transect.

English

Figure 2: Mean Values ± SD (Standard Deviation) of the Maximum Expiratory Flow Arranged by Chronological Age (A) and Biological Age (B).

English

Metabolomic Richness and Fingerprints of Deep-Sea Coral Species and Populations

Metabolomics
BiochemistryEndocrinologyClinical BiochemistryMetabolismDiabetes
2019English

Figure 3: Coral Cover and Condition in Mayotte, June 2010.

English

Figure 3: Comparison of E. Campylosperma and the Most Similar Species.

English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy