Amanote Research

Amanote Research

    RegisterSign In

Lights, Judges, Access: How Active Judicial Review of Discretionary Decisions Protects Access to Government Information

Alberta Law Review
doi 10.29173/alr57
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract

Available in full text

Date

October 1, 2013

Authors
Vincent Kazmierski
Publisher

University of Alberta Libraries


Related search

How to Do Discretionary Access Control Using Roles

1998English

Communicating Public Access to Government Information: Proceedings of the Second Annual Library Government Documents and Information Conference (Book Review)

College and Research Libraries
LibraryInformation Sciences
1984English

Transparency and Access to Government Information in the Netherlands

2018English

Pharmaceutical Care and Access to Health Information Decisions Involving Minors

Canadian Pharmacists Journal
Pharmaceutical SciencePharmacy
2013English

Regulatory Accountability and Responsiveness: A Case Study of How Government Reacts to Judicial Decisions

English

Government Information Access: A Decisive Factor for E-Government

English

Trojan Horse Resistant Discretionary Access Control

2009English

Sharing Guilt: How Better Access to Information May Backfire

Management Science
Management ScienceManagementOperations ResearchStrategy
2019English

A Type System for Discretionary Access Control

Mathematical Structures in Computer Science
MathematicsComputer Science Applications
2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2025 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy