Using Linked Survey and Administrative Data to Better Measure Income: Implications for Poverty, Program Effectiveness and Holes in the Safety Net

doi 10.3386/w21676
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

National Bureau of Economic Research

Related search

Holes in the Safety Net? Social Security and the Alleviation of Poverty in a Comparative Perspective

2017English

Using Linked Administrative Data to Measure Earnings Mobility of Public Assistance Recipients During the Great Recession

International Journal of Population Data Science
2019English

ALWA-ADIAB – Linked Individual Survey and Administrative Data for Substantive and Methodological Research

Schmollers Jahrbuch
2012English

Income, Program Participation, Poverty, and Financial Vulnerability: Research and Data Needs

Journal of Economic and Social Measurement
Social Sciences
2015English

Income Trajectories and Subjective Well-Being: Linking Administrative Records and Survey Data

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
MutagenesisPublic HealthEnvironmentalHealthToxicologyOccupational HealthPollution
2019English

Using Census and Survey Data to Estimate Poverty and Inequality for Small Areas

SSRN Electronic Journal
2007English

Using Administrative Data Sources to Better Understand Student Migration and Circular Travel Patterns

International Journal of Population Data Science
2019English

Using Federal Outlays Data to Measure Program Equity: Opportunities and Limitations

American Journal of Agricultural Economics
AgriculturalEconomicsEconometricsBiological Sciences
1977English

Widening Participation in Higher Education: Analysis Using Linked Administrative Data

2008English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy