Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 1: Summary of the ANCOVA Full Model Results for Each Benthic Component, Comparing Difference in Percent Cover as a Function of Reef Type and Average Percent Cover.
doi 10.7717/peerj.8167/table-1
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 4: Differences in Percent Cover Estimates Between Methods Against the Average Percent Cover Estimated by Both Methods for Each Benthic Component Across the Three Reef Types in Barbados.
Figure 3: Percent Cover of Benthic Community Components.
Supplemental Information 1: Scatterplots of Original Percent Cover Obtained Using the Photoquadrat (PQ) Method vs. Values After Converting to Chain Point-Intercept (CPI) Ones for Each Benthic Component on Three Reef Types.
Table 2: Summary of Conclusions From the Comparisons of Percent Cover Estimates Between Chain Point-Intercept (CPI) and Photoquadrat (PQ) Methods for Six Benthic Components on the Three Reef Types in Barbados.
Figure 3: Scatterplots Showing Original Percent Cover Values Obtained Using the Chain Point-Intercept (CPI) Method vs. The Photoquadrat (PQ) Method for Each Benthic Component on the Three Reef Types.
Supplemental Information 5: Comparison of Observed and Converted Photoquadrat (PQ) % Cover Estimates at Each Reef Type for the Four Benthic Components for Which Differences Between Methods in % Cover Scaled With Average % Cover.
Incorrect Percent Values Reported in Text and Table 1
JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association
Medicine
Table 1: Percent Contribution and Cumulative Contribution of the Environmental Variables to the Maxent Model.
Energy Balance Relative to Percent Plant Cover in a Native Community
Journal of Range Management
