Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Table 13: Benchmark 3–execution Times in Seconds for Individual Phases of the Numerical Solution.
doi 10.7717/peerj-cs.160/table-13
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Table 11: Benchmark 2–execution Times in Seconds for Individual Phases of the Numerical Solution.
Table 9: Benchmark 1–execution Times in Seconds for Individual Phases of the Numerical Solution.
Figure 6: Case 1–Percentage of the Integration Time for Individual Phases of the Numerical Solution in Benchmark 1 (A), Benchmark 2 (B) and Benchmark 3 (C).
Table 17: Benchmark 3–the Time in Seconds Spent in the Multi-Threaded Linear Solver and the Overall Speed-Up.
Table 16: Benchmark 2–the Time in Seconds Spent in the Multi-Threaded Linear Solver and the Overall Speed-Up.
Table 15: Benchmark 1–the Time in Seconds Spent in the Multi-Threaded Linear Solver and the Overall Speed-Up.
Distribution of Execution Times for Sorting Algorithms Implemented in Java
Table 3: Analysis of Variance Tables for the Best GLMM’s for Harvesting and Handling Times.
Non-Contact Atomic Force Microscopy Investigation of the (1 &Times; 1) and (&Radic;3 &Times; &Radic;3) Phases on the Pb/Si(111) Surface
e-Journal of Surface Science and Nanotechnology
Surfaces
Mechanics of Materials
Condensed Matter Physics
Interfaces
Nanoscience
Bioengineering
Films
Biotechnology
Coatings
Nanotechnology
