Improving the Peer-Review Process for Grant Applications: Reliability, Validity, Bias, and Generalizability.

American Psychologist - United States
doi 10.1037/0003-066x.63.3.160
Full Text
Abstract

Available in full text

Date
Authors
Publisher

American Psychological Association (APA)

Related search

The Transparency of the Peer-Review System of Grant Applications.

Journal of Oral Research
Dentistry
2018English

Can Journals Overcome Bias and Make the Peer Review Process More Inclusive?

IFLA Journal
LibraryInformation Sciences
2019English

Peer Review Bias: A Critical Review

Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Medicine
2019English

Does Gender Matter in Grant Peer Review?

Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology
ArtsPsychologyHumanities
2012English

The Delphi Process: A Solution for Reviewing Novel Grant Applications

International Journal of General Medicine
Medicine
2010English

Improving Writing Through the Peer-To-Peer Evaluation Process

Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER)
2015English

Peer Review of Grant Applications: A Simple Method to Identify Proposals With Discordant Reviews

PLoS ONE
Multidisciplinary
2011English

Improving Peer Grading Reliability With Graph Mining Techniques

International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning
EngineeringEducationE-learning
2016English

Evaluating Grant Peer Review in the Health Sciences: A Review of the Literature

2009English

Amanote Research

Note-taking for researchers

Follow Amanote

© 2024 Amaplex Software S.P.R.L. All rights reserved.

Privacy PolicyRefund Policy