Amanote Research
Register
Sign In
Figure 3: Clustering Accuracy of (A) the CROSS Dataset, (B) the Lankershim Dataset.
doi 10.7717/peerjcs.206/fig-3
Full Text
Open PDF
Abstract
Available in
full text
Date
Unknown
Authors
Unknown
Publisher
PeerJ
Related search
Figure 5: The Impact of Grid Size on the Clustering Accuracy: (A) the CROSS Dataset, (B) the Lankershim Dataset.
Figure 6: Cluster Models: (A) the CROSS Dataset, (B) the Lankershim Dataset.
Figure 1: Search Accuracy on the RFAM V11 Dataset.
Figure 3: The ML Trees From a Reduced Dataset.
Table 2: The CCR Performance of Different Methods for the Lankershim Dataset.
Figure 1: Vehicle Trajectories in CROSS Dataset.
Figure 2: The Lankershim Dataset: (A) Area of Interest, (B) Vehicle Trajectories in the Interest Area Collected From 8:30 Am to 8:45 Am.
Figure 4: Assembly Accuracy Comparison Between Two Alternative Strategies on CAMI2 Simulated Dataset (A and B) and the MetaHIT Human Microbiome Dataset (C and D).
Figure 3: BMPR1A in the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Dataset.
